<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Panasonic HVX200 review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/another-panasonic-hvx200-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/another-panasonic-hvx200-review/</link>
	<description>Low/no budget filmmaker blogs daily on subjects like video production, HD cameras, screenwriting, etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dmcqueen</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/another-panasonic-hvx200-review/#comment-27548</link>
		<dc:creator>dmcqueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=229#comment-27548</guid>
		<description>hey I'm considering buying an hvx200 package. why shouldn't I do it? the hvx has been available for almost two years now, is it almost outdated? what's coming from Panasonic and Sony in the near future that is similar? if you can answer these question's it would really help me out.  thanks. 

-fellow filmmaker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey I&#8217;m considering buying an hvx200 package. why shouldn&#8217;t I do it? the hvx has been available for almost two years now, is it almost outdated? what&#8217;s coming from Panasonic and Sony in the near future that is similar? if you can answer these question&#8217;s it would really help me out.  thanks. </p>
<p>-fellow filmmaker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
