<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic AG-HPX300</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/panasonic-ag-hpx300/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/panasonic-ag-hpx300/</link>
	<description>Low/no budget filmmaker blogs daily on subjects like video production, HD cameras, screenwriting, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:15:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Serge</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/panasonic-ag-hpx300/comment-page-1/#comment-29614</link>
		<dc:creator>Serge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=399#comment-29614</guid>
		<description>I have bought the HPX300 a year ago and have shot a feature film with it. While a few pople criticized the 300 for having a 1/3 inch sensor, from my personal experience it hasn&#039;t been too much of a problem. Where I needed shallow DOF, I just backed up, zoomed in and was good to go. AVC-I is awesome, 4:2:2 color sampling is great as well allowing us to color-grade as much as we wanted withough introducing artifacts.  I have to say that in that price range it is a killer camera. Flexible, capable, portable.  All of the needed functions are right there via hardware not menus.  It also has CAC, DRS, capable of recording proxies (used as dailies).  I hooked it up with a RedRockMicro matte box and follow focus 2 and was in business.  It also has very low power consumption, built in hd monitor and many many other pro goodies. 

I recommend it to any indie filmmaker. And if you bent outta shape cuz it has 1/3 imager, get over it, get a relay for SLR lenses and be set. This camera delivers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have bought the HPX300 a year ago and have shot a feature film with it. While a few pople criticized the 300 for having a 1/3 inch sensor, from my personal experience it hasn&#8217;t been too much of a problem. Where I needed shallow DOF, I just backed up, zoomed in and was good to go. AVC-I is awesome, 4:2:2 color sampling is great as well allowing us to color-grade as much as we wanted withough introducing artifacts.  I have to say that in that price range it is a killer camera. Flexible, capable, portable.  All of the needed functions are right there via hardware not menus.  It also has CAC, DRS, capable of recording proxies (used as dailies).  I hooked it up with a RedRockMicro matte box and follow focus 2 and was in business.  It also has very low power consumption, built in hd monitor and many many other pro goodies. </p>
<p>I recommend it to any indie filmmaker. And if you bent outta shape cuz it has 1/3 imager, get over it, get a relay for SLR lenses and be set. This camera delivers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shmeer Panasonic HVX200 owner</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/panasonic-ag-hpx300/comment-page-1/#comment-29482</link>
		<dc:creator>Shmeer Panasonic HVX200 owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=399#comment-29482</guid>
		<description>Well, I am a proud owner of HVX200a and had the opportunity to test this baby. I must say, I was impressed, but not as much to pay almost double the price I paid for HVX. Is it really worth it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am a proud owner of HVX200a and had the opportunity to test this baby. I must say, I was impressed, but not as much to pay almost double the price I paid for HVX. Is it really worth it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
