<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheerleaders in slomo &#8211; courtesy of Panasonic HVX200</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/panasonic-hvx200-slow-motion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/panasonic-hvx200-slow-motion/</link>
	<description>Low/no budget filmmaker blogs daily on subjects like video production, HD cameras, screenwriting, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:24:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/panasonic-hvx200-slow-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-1460</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 05:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=122#comment-1460</guid>
		<description>can&#039;t open link to view film.  Not on sticky pod site anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can&#8217;t open link to view film.  Not on sticky pod site anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/panasonic-hvx200-slow-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=122#comment-720</guid>
		<description>Hi Mr. Administrator.... 

I am strongly considering this Panasonic - AGHVX200 over the JVC GYHD100U.  I&#039;m new to the video world, but have many years of photography under my belt.  I would really like to see the video clip that was posted in the article, but unfortunately the link doesn&#039;t work.  Do you happen to have another link, or could I get it via FTP so I could see what everyone is talking so highly about?

Best regards,

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mr. Administrator&#8230;. </p>
<p>I am strongly considering this Panasonic &#8211; AGHVX200 over the JVC GYHD100U.  I&#8217;m new to the video world, but have many years of photography under my belt.  I would really like to see the video clip that was posted in the article, but unfortunately the link doesn&#8217;t work.  Do you happen to have another link, or could I get it via FTP so I could see what everyone is talking so highly about?</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/panasonic-hvx200-slow-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=122#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Hey Christopher,

The footage does look fantastic... Panasonic HVX200 is the only one to support 60 FPS so it&#039;s your best bet short of a 16mm Arri. 16mm Arris can shoot up to 75 FPS with their standard motor and they can be upgaded to 150 FPS. So the HVX200 is not much worse than a standard 16mm camera which is saying a LOT.

As to interchangeable lenses ... it&#039;s a shame, I know. Probably Panasonic don&#039;t want to cannibalize their &quot;Varicam&quot; which offers that and much more. 

On the other hand there are lens adaptors that can modify the standard lens. In addition, there&#039;s 2 manufacturers (more like workshops) that offer a 35mm adaptor for the HVX200. It will enable you to use ANY 35mm lens - much like Canon XL H1. Rumors put it at $999...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Christopher,</p>
<p>The footage does look fantastic&#8230; Panasonic HVX200 is the only one to support 60 FPS so it&#8217;s your best bet short of a 16mm Arri. 16mm Arris can shoot up to 75 FPS with their standard motor and they can be upgaded to 150 FPS. So the HVX200 is not much worse than a standard 16mm camera which is saying a LOT.</p>
<p>As to interchangeable lenses &#8230; it&#8217;s a shame, I know. Probably Panasonic don&#8217;t want to cannibalize their &#8220;Varicam&#8221; which offers that and much more. </p>
<p>On the other hand there are lens adaptors that can modify the standard lens. In addition, there&#8217;s 2 manufacturers (more like workshops) that offer a 35mm adaptor for the HVX200. It will enable you to use ANY 35mm lens &#8211; much like Canon XL H1. Rumors put it at $999&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/panasonic-hvx200-slow-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=122#comment-429</guid>
		<description>damn - it doesn&#039;t do interchangable lenses?  that seems like a major drawback...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t do interchangable lenses?  that seems like a major drawback&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/panasonic-hvx200-slow-motion/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=122#comment-428</guid>
		<description>wow - that footage looks amazing.  even with the dixv compression.  these cameras are getting great.  are there any cameras that support higher frame rates?  i&#039;ve seen wakeboarding footage (my passion), that must have been shot on film at something like 120fps - amazing looking.  

thanks for the reviews.  this camera looks fantastic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow &#8211; that footage looks amazing.  even with the dixv compression.  these cameras are getting great.  are there any cameras that support higher frame rates?  i&#8217;ve seen wakeboarding footage (my passion), that must have been shot on film at something like 120fps &#8211; amazing looking.  </p>
<p>thanks for the reviews.  this camera looks fantastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

