<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revolver explanation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/</link>
	<description>Low/no budget filmmaker blogs daily on subjects like video production, HD cameras, screenwriting, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:24:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackholeson</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30597</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackholeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30597</guid>
		<description>Mindf**k.

My reaction to this movie is that I can&#039;t easily make any sense of all the symbolism, egoism, and mysticism, but I can&#039;t help myself. I have to try to process and make sense. Stupid ego. While there are many theories and brilliant observations, which I&#039;m sure was an intentional byproduct of this blog and production in general, still the only thing that makes sense to me is that there are some loosely tied together concepts which are simply open to interpretation.

There were times when Jake hears his own voice talking where I was so on edge and thinking that any second that Jake will have an epiphany and it will all make sense, but that never really happens.

In the end, like life, it is what you make of it, even if it doesn&#039;t make any sense. My ego tells me this is unacceptable, that the game really was to make a mindf**k movie which revolves around idealigical concepts which are blurred further by gangster chess pieces and angelic loan sharks and layer upon layer of misdirection and information perpetually revolving, unwinding, revolving some more, and evntually we have a knotted up tale which seems to have no beginning and no end. it is just a knot which is impossible to cypher, unravel, or unrevlolve. 

So here is my sequel. Mr green becomes enlightened and decides to take his money and start a Super-PAC and backs Newt Gingrich, stops playing chess and starts playing Scrabble with a caveman and Brian Orakpo and learns that sometimes scrabble words are hurtful to cavemen, but they are amusing to linebackers who play for the Washington Redskins. Hang in there it will all make sense.

Tell you ego that we are you, and the only way to get smarter is by playing against smarter opponents, and the best place to hide is in a C4, and that corporations are people. In the end Mr. Green wakes up and realizes that he is actually renown talk show host Mr. Colbert and was having a terrible nightmare and that there were never any convicts in solitary confinement with him and that Vincent Pastore is a guest on his show with musical guest Outkast, and Ray Liotta is now president and starring in the prequel to Revolver called Rayvolver. In the final scene Stephen figures out the ultimate scrabble con, Sarah Palin admits that she has no idea what she&#039;s talking about, and to top it all off, and here&#039;s the twist, Mr. Colbert is also f**king Madonna which ties in nicely with the Kabbala theme. And during the credits Fox News will explain the dichotomy of having an agenda and maintaining mock objectivity and being paradoxically credible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mindf**k.</p>
<p>My reaction to this movie is that I can&#8217;t easily make any sense of all the symbolism, egoism, and mysticism, but I can&#8217;t help myself. I have to try to process and make sense. Stupid ego. While there are many theories and brilliant observations, which I&#8217;m sure was an intentional byproduct of this blog and production in general, still the only thing that makes sense to me is that there are some loosely tied together concepts which are simply open to interpretation.</p>
<p>There were times when Jake hears his own voice talking where I was so on edge and thinking that any second that Jake will have an epiphany and it will all make sense, but that never really happens.</p>
<p>In the end, like life, it is what you make of it, even if it doesn&#8217;t make any sense. My ego tells me this is unacceptable, that the game really was to make a mindf**k movie which revolves around idealigical concepts which are blurred further by gangster chess pieces and angelic loan sharks and layer upon layer of misdirection and information perpetually revolving, unwinding, revolving some more, and evntually we have a knotted up tale which seems to have no beginning and no end. it is just a knot which is impossible to cypher, unravel, or unrevlolve. </p>
<p>So here is my sequel. Mr green becomes enlightened and decides to take his money and start a Super-PAC and backs Newt Gingrich, stops playing chess and starts playing Scrabble with a caveman and Brian Orakpo and learns that sometimes scrabble words are hurtful to cavemen, but they are amusing to linebackers who play for the Washington Redskins. Hang in there it will all make sense.</p>
<p>Tell you ego that we are you, and the only way to get smarter is by playing against smarter opponents, and the best place to hide is in a C4, and that corporations are people. In the end Mr. Green wakes up and realizes that he is actually renown talk show host Mr. Colbert and was having a terrible nightmare and that there were never any convicts in solitary confinement with him and that Vincent Pastore is a guest on his show with musical guest Outkast, and Ray Liotta is now president and starring in the prequel to Revolver called Rayvolver. In the final scene Stephen figures out the ultimate scrabble con, Sarah Palin admits that she has no idea what she&#8217;s talking about, and to top it all off, and here&#8217;s the twist, Mr. Colbert is also f**king Madonna which ties in nicely with the Kabbala theme. And during the credits Fox News will explain the dichotomy of having an agenda and maintaining mock objectivity and being paradoxically credible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silent</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30528</link>
		<dc:creator>Silent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30528</guid>
		<description>some one help me with this- lowkey213@gmail.com

everyone here is talking about ego&#039;s all because the end of the movie says so, but that is part of the illusion of the movie, yes ego&#039;s do exist but that&#039;s a minor part of the movie. 

in the beginning of the movie, it states the playing a smarter opponent, which is at the end of the game you, you go from the later to the former(i get the concept but not its entirety).

it also states, #1 rule in business is protect your investment, the title of the book is Etiquette of the banker 1775 - the year is interesting for 1776 and the whole creation of the US and all, not to mention the 12 dollar bill used which goes so deep and long i cant explain it here....

the destroying the ego is to set himself free of himself, you can only really be free when you have lost everything there is to lose, thus rock bottom. break yourself down to rebuild yourself into the former...doesn&#039;t end there.

the books the prisoners were reading were astrophysics books and quantum mechanics books, thus the two conmen were bracing him for a new reality, a reality that MR. Gold lived in and so did they but gold being eternal for he has been their for eternity with the conmen just getting their. The reality is we are in the 3rd dimensional realm, the two conmen and gold have skipped to the 4th dimension, thus they can adjust the 3D realm as they please, hence knowing about the elevator and the shooting, including the disease and curing it, but they needed him to arive their on his own, it cant be forced. 

someone help me with this, cause its too much, emails up top, thanx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some one help me with this- <a href="mailto:lowkey213@gmail.com">lowkey213@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>everyone here is talking about ego&#8217;s all because the end of the movie says so, but that is part of the illusion of the movie, yes ego&#8217;s do exist but that&#8217;s a minor part of the movie. </p>
<p>in the beginning of the movie, it states the playing a smarter opponent, which is at the end of the game you, you go from the later to the former(i get the concept but not its entirety).</p>
<p>it also states, #1 rule in business is protect your investment, the title of the book is Etiquette of the banker 1775 &#8211; the year is interesting for 1776 and the whole creation of the US and all, not to mention the 12 dollar bill used which goes so deep and long i cant explain it here&#8230;.</p>
<p>the destroying the ego is to set himself free of himself, you can only really be free when you have lost everything there is to lose, thus rock bottom. break yourself down to rebuild yourself into the former&#8230;doesn&#8217;t end there.</p>
<p>the books the prisoners were reading were astrophysics books and quantum mechanics books, thus the two conmen were bracing him for a new reality, a reality that MR. Gold lived in and so did they but gold being eternal for he has been their for eternity with the conmen just getting their. The reality is we are in the 3rd dimensional realm, the two conmen and gold have skipped to the 4th dimension, thus they can adjust the 3D realm as they please, hence knowing about the elevator and the shooting, including the disease and curing it, but they needed him to arive their on his own, it cant be forced. </p>
<p>someone help me with this, cause its too much, emails up top, thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30501</link>
		<dc:creator>New</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30501</guid>
		<description>This thread is very interesting. Personally, I believe all interpretations are valid and can all exist at the same time, and be a part of the story. The ego, the chess, the angels, the different personalities or different aspects of ones consciousness, the good vs evil, are all elements of life, and thus can all be elements of the movie that coexist without clashing with each other. 
Some elements that interest me that were not mentioned:

1) Why does Zach take the watch from the fat Asian guy at the hotel? I think this has to do with another element of the movie which is the illusion of TIME. The theory that time does not exist could be related to this since it is not clear whether the whole movie is happening in Green&#039;s mind while he is still in jail, or if he in fact did get out and parts of the movie really did happen and others did not. This also has to do with the part where he is run over by the car and then time goes back and when they know things ahead of time.  

2) Another crazy interpretation could be that all of existence is a game of chess being played again and again by God and the Devil. I do not really believe this is the intention of the movie but just a fun concept to think about (BTW I do not believe in neither one of them)

Finally, I recommend that people do not waste time calling each other ignorant, or try to decide whether or not the movie is a masterpiece or a piece of crap, or which interpretation is correct and which one is not. The great thing about movies and books like these are made is that it makes us think about and discuss these ideas, which I think is what in the end is all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thread is very interesting. Personally, I believe all interpretations are valid and can all exist at the same time, and be a part of the story. The ego, the chess, the angels, the different personalities or different aspects of ones consciousness, the good vs evil, are all elements of life, and thus can all be elements of the movie that coexist without clashing with each other.<br />
Some elements that interest me that were not mentioned:</p>
<p>1) Why does Zach take the watch from the fat Asian guy at the hotel? I think this has to do with another element of the movie which is the illusion of TIME. The theory that time does not exist could be related to this since it is not clear whether the whole movie is happening in Green&#8217;s mind while he is still in jail, or if he in fact did get out and parts of the movie really did happen and others did not. This also has to do with the part where he is run over by the car and then time goes back and when they know things ahead of time.  </p>
<p>2) Another crazy interpretation could be that all of existence is a game of chess being played again and again by God and the Devil. I do not really believe this is the intention of the movie but just a fun concept to think about (BTW I do not believe in neither one of them)</p>
<p>Finally, I recommend that people do not waste time calling each other ignorant, or try to decide whether or not the movie is a masterpiece or a piece of crap, or which interpretation is correct and which one is not. The great thing about movies and books like these are made is that it makes us think about and discuss these ideas, which I think is what in the end is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vishvanath</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30500</link>
		<dc:creator>vishvanath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30500</guid>
		<description>it tells about ego(teach about ego in Buddhist).Actually we are controlled.it&#039;s hard to understand first.think about ur self honestly &amp; try 2 b honest 2 u.After that u&#039;l understand this film. nice film....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it tells about ego(teach about ego in Buddhist).Actually we are controlled.it&#8217;s hard to understand first.think about ur self honestly &amp; try 2 b honest 2 u.After that u&#8217;l understand this film. nice film&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebel</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30488</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30488</guid>
		<description>Could the one&#039;s who delivered the books in jail to Green be Avi/Zack ? instead of being neighbours cause how the hell do they disappear and if they are his imagination, who send the Lady that went to Macha with the powder? was Green schizo?
The way I see it Zack and Avi used Green as a pon to destroy the 2 big gangsters of the city Macha&#039;s and Lord&#039;s, but then again how about the jacuzzi scene? some things don&#039;t make sens......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could the one&#8217;s who delivered the books in jail to Green be Avi/Zack ? instead of being neighbours cause how the hell do they disappear and if they are his imagination, who send the Lady that went to Macha with the powder? was Green schizo?<br />
The way I see it Zack and Avi used Green as a pon to destroy the 2 big gangsters of the city Macha&#8217;s and Lord&#8217;s, but then again how about the jacuzzi scene? some things don&#8217;t make sens&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leo</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30480</link>
		<dc:creator>leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30480</guid>
		<description>if mr. green doesnt like confined spaces why would he choose to do solitary.. at first we might think it was to get his time over with quicker, but in reality its his ego that doesnt like confined spaces because then he might be challenged.. why, i dont quite know, but we do see jake get his freedom in a confined space, and in solitary he meets and gets his instruction  from avi and zack.. why do confined spaces hurt the ego, i dont have the answer to that, but i do find it curious however that in confined spaces he is armed with the basics and eventually overcomes his ego.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if mr. green doesnt like confined spaces why would he choose to do solitary.. at first we might think it was to get his time over with quicker, but in reality its his ego that doesnt like confined spaces because then he might be challenged.. why, i dont quite know, but we do see jake get his freedom in a confined space, and in solitary he meets and gets his instruction  from avi and zack.. why do confined spaces hurt the ego, i dont have the answer to that, but i do find it curious however that in confined spaces he is armed with the basics and eventually overcomes his ego.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonboi</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30479</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonboi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30479</guid>
		<description>This is a great film, the cast are wonderful, and the scenes are brilliantly shot.

I have read some of the comments and thank everyone for taking the time to explain. Guy Ritchie in his commentary explains a great deal,; its on the DVD! Choose a different audio stream!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great film, the cast are wonderful, and the scenes are brilliantly shot.</p>
<p>I have read some of the comments and thank everyone for taking the time to explain. Guy Ritchie in his commentary explains a great deal,; its on the DVD! Choose a different audio stream!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archer</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30473</link>
		<dc:creator>Archer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 16:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30473</guid>
		<description>Tanks for fantastic explanations.
Don&#039;t worry when you don&#039;t get it. Read Eckhart Tolle before you watch and it will make more sense. However I&#039;m afraid one can only get it once he already had a battle with own ego. For others it will be just nonsense.

My take on few things not explained here:

Gold is what/who egos aspire to become or get close to.

Con+Chess = consciousness makes perfect sense. Reason and Doubts/Ego-Self-Con form that little voice of pure heart conscience.

Giving to old lady...approval junkie act.

Sorter...feelings.

But I have some questions:

What is that with Three Eddies? 

His brother...man of status quo, afraid of confronting ego? He loses his wife to Eddies. And finally is nailed...feelings/Sorter saving his child but ego or Macha eventually threatening to kill her. Green has to save her by standing up to him one more time, bringing back the Gold&#039;s stuff. ??? Wow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tanks for fantastic explanations.<br />
Don&#8217;t worry when you don&#8217;t get it. Read Eckhart Tolle before you watch and it will make more sense. However I&#8217;m afraid one can only get it once he already had a battle with own ego. For others it will be just nonsense.</p>
<p>My take on few things not explained here:</p>
<p>Gold is what/who egos aspire to become or get close to.</p>
<p>Con+Chess = consciousness makes perfect sense. Reason and Doubts/Ego-Self-Con form that little voice of pure heart conscience.</p>
<p>Giving to old lady&#8230;approval junkie act.</p>
<p>Sorter&#8230;feelings.</p>
<p>But I have some questions:</p>
<p>What is that with Three Eddies? </p>
<p>His brother&#8230;man of status quo, afraid of confronting ego? He loses his wife to Eddies. And finally is nailed&#8230;feelings/Sorter saving his child but ego or Macha eventually threatening to kill her. Green has to save her by standing up to him one more time, bringing back the Gold&#8217;s stuff. ??? Wow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogrober</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30469</link>
		<dc:creator>dogrober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30469</guid>
		<description>OK watched this movie the other day...and I&#039;m still obsessing over it!
 
I think I get it... pretty well.(yes after watching it twice). But why would/did the loan sharks(who even Mr. Gold didn&#039;t want to mess with) get envolved. 

And really why would Jason pick solitaire when he can&#039;t even abide an evevator car?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK watched this movie the other day&#8230;and I&#8217;m still obsessing over it!</p>
<p>I think I get it&#8230; pretty well.(yes after watching it twice). But why would/did the loan sharks(who even Mr. Gold didn&#8217;t want to mess with) get envolved. </p>
<p>And really why would Jason pick solitaire when he can&#8217;t even abide an evevator car?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tez</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30467</link>
		<dc:creator>tez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30467</guid>
		<description>this movie revolver is one master piece... i just loved it...i feel this is something we all experience.... its the conflict between yourself and your mind... the mind makes you believe that its you,and the fact is its not....the conflict starts when u recognize it and start doing something about it.... but the one who succeeds in bringing the mind under his control is next to God..... thatz what i understood from this movie... i appreciate the makers of this movie... they must have had a heck of a research regarding the topic, before making it... just a perfect piece of art.... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this movie revolver is one master piece&#8230; i just loved it&#8230;i feel this is something we all experience&#8230;. its the conflict between yourself and your mind&#8230; the mind makes you believe that its you,and the fact is its not&#8230;.the conflict starts when u recognize it and start doing something about it&#8230;. but the one who succeeds in bringing the mind under his control is next to God&#8230;.. thatz what i understood from this movie&#8230; i appreciate the makers of this movie&#8230; they must have had a heck of a research regarding the topic, before making it&#8230; just a perfect piece of art&#8230;. <img src='http://www.filmdailies.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30465</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 06:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30465</guid>
		<description>Avi and Zach are not angels or figments of green&#039;s personality.  Dive in to some mysticism and you will see why they appear to be these things.  They have mastered their reality and thus are able to master all of the physical reality around them.  A remarkable film.  Now if I can only get out of this monkey suit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avi and Zach are not angels or figments of green&#8217;s personality.  Dive in to some mysticism and you will see why they appear to be these things.  They have mastered their reality and thus are able to master all of the physical reality around them.  A remarkable film.  Now if I can only get out of this monkey suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30462</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 02:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30462</guid>
		<description>Someone asked earlier why when the two guys are trying to help Mr. Green along on this great spiritual do they have no problem killing people. This is because good and evil are purely concepts created by the ego. Example, animals have no sense of good and evil because they have no ego. If you like the religious angle then this can be shown in Genesis with Adam and Eve eating from the tree of good and evil and gaining an ego where before they were innocent because they had no concept of such things. Like children who have yet to develop an ego. The apple gave them an ego which is why they suddenly felt shame for being naked. No ego no possibility of shame.

Honestly this movie has a seriously important message. The loss of ego would remove basically every evil existent in the world today. Interested in how to achieve that? Look into zen teachings they are almost universally about achieving a loss of ego.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone asked earlier why when the two guys are trying to help Mr. Green along on this great spiritual do they have no problem killing people. This is because good and evil are purely concepts created by the ego. Example, animals have no sense of good and evil because they have no ego. If you like the religious angle then this can be shown in Genesis with Adam and Eve eating from the tree of good and evil and gaining an ego where before they were innocent because they had no concept of such things. Like children who have yet to develop an ego. The apple gave them an ego which is why they suddenly felt shame for being naked. No ego no possibility of shame.</p>
<p>Honestly this movie has a seriously important message. The loss of ego would remove basically every evil existent in the world today. Interested in how to achieve that? Look into zen teachings they are almost universally about achieving a loss of ego.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ParanoidBob</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30455</link>
		<dc:creator>ParanoidBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 23:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30455</guid>
		<description>Some theories on this page are crazy, but not crazy enough to be true.  (Niels Bohr, paraphrased.)

Like irrational numbers, some notions cannot be fully presented within so-called reality, within the bounds of sanity, within a dream within a dream.

I enjoy Revolver because its meaning to me changes whenever I view it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some theories on this page are crazy, but not crazy enough to be true.  (Niels Bohr, paraphrased.)</p>
<p>Like irrational numbers, some notions cannot be fully presented within so-called reality, within the bounds of sanity, within a dream within a dream.</p>
<p>I enjoy Revolver because its meaning to me changes whenever I view it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30454</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30454</guid>
		<description>I really liked the movie. To think green lost everything he had to get to his own ego. first his health, then he loses all of his money, he loses his sense of protection by geting himself on the elevator.

the character sacrifices all he has in order to beat the game. rembember how he says that by sacrificing the chess pieces and letting the oponent win he actually got closer to winning the game? i think this could be the same principle. The movie has a nice message. forget about material stuff, overcome your fears, learn to sacrifice in order to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked the movie. To think green lost everything he had to get to his own ego. first his health, then he loses all of his money, he loses his sense of protection by geting himself on the elevator.</p>
<p>the character sacrifices all he has in order to beat the game. rembember how he says that by sacrificing the chess pieces and letting the oponent win he actually got closer to winning the game? i think this could be the same principle. The movie has a nice message. forget about material stuff, overcome your fears, learn to sacrifice in order to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blompz</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30453</link>
		<dc:creator>blompz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30453</guid>
		<description>Revolver is trying to explain a concept of Christianity.  The devil controls your mind and makes you think the voice inside you is actually you when its not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revolver is trying to explain a concept of Christianity.  The devil controls your mind and makes you think the voice inside you is actually you when its not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30452</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30452</guid>
		<description>if they are the cons from jail why didnt he recgnize their voices?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if they are the cons from jail why didnt he recgnize their voices?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wickedwendy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30450</link>
		<dc:creator>wickedwendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30450</guid>
		<description>Wow!! Here it is 6 yrs later and I&#039;m just watching this movie for the first time. Why have I never seen any previews to this before? What a concept and a way to put it into perspective. It is definately something to think about and watch a couple more times. 
Way to keep the public&#039;s &quot;short attention span&quot; into a movie!! Not many movies can do that now-a-days. 
Thanks guys for a GREAT movie with an awsome concept and debate to think about!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!! Here it is 6 yrs later and I&#8217;m just watching this movie for the first time. Why have I never seen any previews to this before? What a concept and a way to put it into perspective. It is definately something to think about and watch a couple more times.<br />
Way to keep the public&#8217;s &#8220;short attention span&#8221; into a movie!! Not many movies can do that now-a-days.<br />
Thanks guys for a GREAT movie with an awsome concept and debate to think about!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30443</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 09:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30443</guid>
		<description>i dont think it helps that there are different versions of this movie. I dont think people see the full story. I believe the main story is about religion (good vs evil). The guy earlier showed us a pic of the 12 dollar bill and was covered with religion. And the version i saw was Andre Benjamin running his finger over the slot machines and coins start pouring out (hello angel?) and Liotta didnt kill himself at the end. Everyone will look at this in their own way but if i had to bet then i would bet the overall theme would be about some kind of religion. Not just ego or a mental disorder. There are way too many religious references in this movie. And Andre Benjamin running hiss finger over the slot machines and coins pour out just tops off my point even more. I do love the extra chess references throwin throughout the movie. I do agree that that was designed to be like that as well as the kabbalah references as well. Also i dont think there is a right or wrong answer on how you feell about the movie. I think it was purposely made for that rezction, that people believe what they want. Also, I wish there were more people in this world like Jort Duijnker. You had a great post and from what i could tell from it was that you seem to be a very kind and open minded person.

Take care everyone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont think it helps that there are different versions of this movie. I dont think people see the full story. I believe the main story is about religion (good vs evil). The guy earlier showed us a pic of the 12 dollar bill and was covered with religion. And the version i saw was Andre Benjamin running his finger over the slot machines and coins start pouring out (hello angel?) and Liotta didnt kill himself at the end. Everyone will look at this in their own way but if i had to bet then i would bet the overall theme would be about some kind of religion. Not just ego or a mental disorder. There are way too many religious references in this movie. And Andre Benjamin running hiss finger over the slot machines and coins pour out just tops off my point even more. I do love the extra chess references throwin throughout the movie. I do agree that that was designed to be like that as well as the kabbalah references as well. Also i dont think there is a right or wrong answer on how you feell about the movie. I think it was purposely made for that rezction, that people believe what they want. Also, I wish there were more people in this world like Jort Duijnker. You had a great post and from what i could tell from it was that you seem to be a very kind and open minded person.</p>
<p>Take care everyone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin gillette</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30440</link>
		<dc:creator>justin gillette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 07:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30440</guid>
		<description>what the fuck? how can critics bash this movie? 
okay, don&#039;t get me wrong I like David Lynch and I think he is a genius on some level but how can his surreal vague loosely plotted bullshit like Mullholland Drive be hailed by critics everywhere and be nominated for Oscars while Guy Richie makes an intellectual movie actually filled with religious symbolism and allusions and it gets shat on? FUCK HOLLYWOOD AND FUCK TWO-FACED IGNORANT CRITICS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what the fuck? how can critics bash this movie?<br />
okay, don&#8217;t get me wrong I like David Lynch and I think he is a genius on some level but how can his surreal vague loosely plotted bullshit like Mullholland Drive be hailed by critics everywhere and be nominated for Oscars while Guy Richie makes an intellectual movie actually filled with religious symbolism and allusions and it gets shat on? FUCK HOLLYWOOD AND FUCK TWO-FACED IGNORANT CRITICS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/revolver-explanation/comment-page-3/#comment-30436</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 08:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=153#comment-30436</guid>
		<description>Holy Shit...

I just watched the film.... and the titles where all in German. I looked up the translations online. Then when it was over came here and started reading. The guy who said he met Guy and there are different versions in different countries is right. The version I watched had no credits on the end. When I got to the comment that talked about the shrinks in the credits I&#039;m like what, I didn&#039;t see the credits. So I go to Netflix to watch the instant version there just to see the credits... but I watch a little and Whaaaaa - the film is totally different. Whole major scenes Many of them GONE. The ending totally different...
One guy earlier is talking about Macha committing suicide at the end and another guy asking him to explain. Well yeah because they aren&#039;t watching the same fucking versions. 
I am excited that my second watching is going to be a totally different edit. Should give some fun extra perspective. 
cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy Shit&#8230;</p>
<p>I just watched the film&#8230;. and the titles where all in German. I looked up the translations online. Then when it was over came here and started reading. The guy who said he met Guy and there are different versions in different countries is right. The version I watched had no credits on the end. When I got to the comment that talked about the shrinks in the credits I&#8217;m like what, I didn&#8217;t see the credits. So I go to Netflix to watch the instant version there just to see the credits&#8230; but I watch a little and Whaaaaa &#8211; the film is totally different. Whole major scenes Many of them GONE. The ending totally different&#8230;<br />
One guy earlier is talking about Macha committing suicide at the end and another guy asking him to explain. Well yeah because they aren&#8217;t watching the same fucking versions.<br />
I am excited that my second watching is going to be a totally different edit. Should give some fun extra perspective.<br />
cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

