<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony HC3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/sony-hc3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/sony-hc3/</link>
	<description>Low/no budget filmmaker blogs daily on subjects like video production, HD cameras, screenwriting, etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Canon HV20 Camcorder at FilmDailies.com - A filmmaker&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/sony-hc3/#comment-27542</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon HV20 Camcorder at FilmDailies.com - A filmmaker&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=179#comment-27542</guid>
		<description>[...] DV.com&#8217;s Chuck Gloman has a more detailed review of the camera. Overall, he was impressed by the outdoors footage and the form factor. I&#8217;m still not convinced I&#8217;ll trade a small-factor Sony (like Sony HC3). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DV.com&#8217;s Chuck Gloman has a more detailed review of the camera. Overall, he was impressed by the outdoors footage and the form factor. I&#8217;m still not convinced I&#8217;ll trade a small-factor Sony (like Sony HC3). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/sony-hc3/#comment-3546</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=179#comment-3546</guid>
		<description>Thanks Javier... I definitely agree with you, I'm not throwing MY SONY HC3 away. In some cases, however, you risk your cam (for whatever reason). You don't want to risk your high-end cam that costs 35,000. You should take the shot with a cheaper HD cam and HC3 is perfect!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Javier&#8230; I definitely agree with you, I&#8217;m not throwing MY SONY HC3 away. In some cases, however, you risk your cam (for whatever reason). You don&#8217;t want to risk your high-end cam that costs 35,000. You should take the shot with a cheaper HD cam and HC3 is perfect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier O.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmdailies.com/archives/sony-hc3/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 21:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmdailies.com/?p=179#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>U$S 1000 makes a disposable cam? :(
I´m saving hard earned U$S 350 to see if I can get some people traveling to the states to buy me a Canon zr600 (lame I know) to start shooting something.

Dispose my way any old cameras you may want to dispose ;). Anyway kind regards from Uruguay, I really like your posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U$S 1000 makes a disposable cam? <img src='http://www.filmdailies.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I´m saving hard earned U$S 350 to see if I can get some people traveling to the states to buy me a Canon zr600 (lame I know) to start shooting something.</p>
<p>Dispose my way any old cameras you may want to dispose ;). Anyway kind regards from Uruguay, I really like your posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
