Tag Archive for 'filmmaking'

The Weekend numbers explosion

According to a post at the Long Tail, it would seem that Hollywood is doing its best to hide the fact that blockbusters are few and far in between.

I first posted about Hollywood’s plans to produce fewer movies last year. Now it seems they’ll also be massaging the numbers as well.

According to post (a reader who requested anonymity said):

I happened to be riding to work with an exec from one of the major studios this morning, and he mentioned that the studios are increasingly making deals with theaters to inflate opening numbers. In particular, they will give the theaters very high revenue share for the first X days of the movie (he mentioned 100% for the first 3 days), incentivizing the theater to maximize the number of screens the movie’s shown on, inflating opening numbers.

The particular example of Superman and Pirates were actually the ones he brought up - that Superman’s decline was partially due to the theathers’ incentive period running out.

I have no idea how true or prevalent this is, but something you might want to look into. This would be done for movies which the studio considers potential “hits”, increasing discrepancy between them and normal movies.

Funny, I don’t think I heard Bryan Singer mention it in his Superman interview.

I’m still hopeful that the explosion of user-generated content will severely erode the blockbuster’s share of the pie. Remains to be seen if Google Video will finally launch their marketplace for indie producers.

Panasonic HVX200 gets an award

Panasonic HVX200Now, we all know HVX200 deserves an award. An award for making dreams come true for a lot of guys in video production and indie filmmaking.

There’s nothing wrong with getting a few “official” awards as well. On July 10, Panasonic got Bronze IDEA awarded to the AG-HVX200 for excellence in design”. Here’s the press release:

SECAUCUS, NJ (July 10, 2006) – Panasonic Broadcast announced that its high definition, solid state memory AG-HVX200 hand-held camcorder has received a bronze in the 2006 Industrial Design Excellence Award (IDEA) competition for the best designed product in business and industry.

Dislaimer: About IDEA
Celebrating its 26th year, the IDEAs are dedicated to fostering business and public understanding of the importance of industrial design excellence to the quality of life and the economy. The IDEAs are co-sponsored by BusinessWeek and the IDSA, a nonprofit association that represents the profession of industrial design to education, business, government and the public and serves the profession’s needs for information and networking.

An honorable mention

Anne Walk at LoadedPun put a note on their blog about FilmDailies. Much appreciated.

I love this line:

So far, there are a good number of camera reviews for those looking to buy a high end camera. They are beautiful and so very beyond my scope.

No one called camera reviews beautiful before :)

James Bond teaser

The new James Bond is back. You can view the teaser below. Casino Royale should be out in November.

Enjoy!

Panasonic HVX200

Finally! The specs for the Panasonic HVX200 have been sent to a couple of review sites. If you’re in a video production company or (even better) an aspiring filmmaker, you should start taking notes.

Update: You can already get REAL footage from the HVX200, even footage at 60p (frame rates supported by HVX200). The camera should be available in stores, so you might also want to get my recommendations for accessories for HVX200.

Here’s a summary of the important features introduced with the new Panasonic HVX200. I’ll prioritize them for you.

Panasonic HVX200Variable frame rates
Panasonic HVX200 supports a variety of frame rates just like Panasonic’s Varicam (AJ-HDC27). In 720p, the HVX200 records not only in the most popular 24p, 30p, and 60p, but almost any rate between 4 and 60 as well. One limitation is that his flexibility is reserved for 720p.

When we jump up to 1080p, the camera still delivers TRUE 24p – which is amazing considering none of the HDV cams in the same price range support it. Click here for more on HVX200 frame rates.

Robust format
Panasonic HVX200’s HD format is called DVCPRO-HD. The difference between DVCPRO-HD and HDV is about 4 to 1 in terms of data throughput. DVCPRO-HD supports data rates of up to 100Mbps. This allows the camera to record video without applying as much compression as the HDV cameras do. Another advantage in terms of format is the support of 4:2:2 color space - again linked to the 100Mbps allowance. The DVCPRO-HD has been around for several years and has been used in the Varicam.

In addition to the HD format, Panasonic HVX200 also supports standard DV, as well as DVCPRO50 (Panasonic’s more professional DV format with a much lower compression ratio).

Tapeless recording (P2)
The argument tape vs, memory is still raging on. On the negative side, memory is very expensive compared to tape. An 8GB P2 chip that can hold about 10 minutes of HD (depending on frame rate) is going to cost you $1,700. On the positive, it’s quick, durable, and best of all – bound to become cheaper. SONY has pioneered a disc system – XDCAM – which is similar but naturally, cheaper because it uses Blu-Ray discs (27GB).

Panasonic HVX200 takes advantage of its data recording medium in several ways. First, you start recording immediately after you hit the button. In fact, it’s better than that. P2 allows you to start recording BEFORE you hit the button. The memory will buffer 3-7 seconds of video, so even if you don’t have split-second reactions, you’ll be able to capture action flawlessly.

Another advantage is the ability to transfer files directly to your computer (or you could back them up to Firewire drives). During shooting you can also mark takes which you like so that you can start editing in seconds.

Lens and controls
HVX200’s lens is a 13x Leica which compares favourably to SONY FX1. The zoom ring is full manual which is another big plus. Both JVC GY-HD100U and the upcoming Canon XL H1 have interchangeable lenses although the availability and variety of quality lenses is still in question.

Audio
Panasonic HVX200’s more robust format (DVCPRO-HD) allows four uncompressed channels of 16-bit 48Khz quality audio (or two stereo pairs). This is a BIG change from the HDV format.

Final verdict (based on specs)
Panasonic has created a worthy successor to the DVX100. HVX200 excels in all areas and it could be hard for a HDV camera to compete, especially, when you consider the price. At $5,995, it’s only marginally more expensive than SONY Z1 (50 bucks more) but offers a lot more. It’s much cheaper than the interchangeable lens cameras - Canon XL H1 and JVC GY-HD100U.

That’s until you consider the cost for the media. At $1,700 per a pop, 8GB P2’s are going to be a TOUGH sell. In a year’s time, it’ll probably be 2-4 times cheaper, so don’t start stocking on P2s just now. If $6,000 is too much for you, you could get Sony HC1 for less than $1,500 - it’s a more affordable, entry-level HDV camcorder. The bigger and better Sony FX1 is midway (at $3,000 it’s perfect for wedding videography) between the Hc1 and HVX200.

Update: Check out this USB 1.1 vs USB 2.0 speed comparison.

Email: Is HVX200 enough?

I get quite a few emails from people interested in becoming indie producers and filmmakers. Here’s one:

Panasonic HVX200 (Front): offers variable framerates at 720p

Thank you for your webpage and all the valuable information it contains. I had a question please: I want to be a totally independent guerrilla filmmaker, and was wondering if
the Pansonic HVX200 would be good enough a camera to start with? Is the true 24P the most important factor here?

I had intended to shoot with an HD camera of some sort, and then use the software that gives video that
“film look”.

I appreciate your time and assistance. Thank you.

My answer:

Thanks for writing. I think independent film making goes beyond the hardware. It’s true that HVX200 will get you closer to getting filmlike video than say … Sony FX1. However, film and video are two very different media and you cannot expect a $20,000 production to look like a $20,000,000. It’s bound to look “different.”

That’s why, I think you should pick a subject matter that will let you “exploit” the advantages of the digital medium and hopefully mask its weaknesses. For example, you might want to try a “reality” format for your feature. Intrusive, in-your-face camerawork with a lot of close-ups will put emphasis on video’s strengths (check out Waterborne at Google Video).

Hint: Get diffusion filters, if you plan close-ups as video is quite unforgiving to ANY skin imperfections. A good make-up artists is a plus!

I encourage you to rent HVX200 for a weekend and plan a shoot around it. There’s no better way of managing your own expectations for the final result. Once you see the results, you can either select another cam or perhaps change your script a bit to accommodate the specific “look” you get from the camera.

Remember that high-end cameras give you flexibility and protect against errors but at the end, all cameras are the same. I’ve seen some amazing photos coming out of Kodak’s single-use cameras. It’s just that a high-end Canon gives you consistency and flexibility. The same thing applies to camcorders as well.

Hope that makes sense :)

SXSW showcases HVX200

Panasonic HVX200There’s a report at Cinema Minima that while guys from Apple and Panasonic were setting up an Apple G5 / HVX200 combo. The point of the exercise is obviously to showcase how well HVX200 integrates with Apple’s new mac.

If you’re attending SXSW, you might want to check out some of the movie premieres as well. They boast “115 features, 50 of which are World Premieres.” Not exactly equal to Sundance’s selection but nonetheless impressive. Here’s the schedule.

HVX200 at the Olympics

BBC’s ENG teams will be using Panasonic HVX200 during the Winter Olympics in Torino. The information is based in part on an article that talks about BBC experimenting with Panasonic’s P2 tapeless technology.

Panasonic HVX200 (Front): offers variable framerates at 720pThe major issue with HVX200 at this point is that its PAL version hasn’t been released. BBC definitely shoots PAL. It’s not clear whether Panasonic sent pre-production units to the BBC.

Talking about sports coverage, BBC will probably using the interlaced modes and not the progressive frame rates.

Sony is not left in the dust either. It provides a complete solution to NBC for their coverage of the Olympics. The acquision is handled mostly by Sony HDW-730 HDCAM.

Update: It seems the BBC distances itself from more traditional media. Maybe it’s affecting camera choices as well!

Kevin Smith touts HVX200

When Steve Jobs endorsed Sony HC1 at the Macworld San Fran 2006, I thought the race for best HDV cam is over. Not so quick, Steve!

Kevin Smith endorses HVX200Kevin Smith went up on the stage too (naturally not at the MacWorld, it’s reserved for Jobs). He’s standing next to Panasonic ’s Joseph Facchini. If that’s not clue enough, hover above the image…

Yep, Kevin Smith endoresed the HVX200. He apparently went too far, tossing vulgarities left and right. He did end his presentation on a high note though - saying he loves Panasonic HVX200 so much, he’d like to take it to his bedroom and get real down and dirty with the HVX200 and his wife. That’s the indie filmmaker’s threesome

I have one question though: If he loves it so much, why did he shoot Clerks 2 on film? So between his wife and the HVX200 … he chose film.

Cheerleaders in slomo - courtesy of Panasonic HVX200

Panasonic HVX200 is all over the site and for a good reason. I finally got to see some of the 60 FPS footage shot by Jarred Land at DVXuser.


He got amazing CHEERLEADERS in real slow motion!

Cheerleaders in slow motion thanks to Panasonic HVX200

You can download the clip directly - click here. Keep in mind the clip has been resized and compressed.

The original was shot at 720p - 60 FPS. HVX200 supports a whole range of frame rates at 720p but I’ve always found that slow motion is much, much more useful. I’m a bit hesitant to check what Jarred’s next test will be. For all I know, he could decide to switch to sexy babysitters!

Panasonic HVX200: Lens Adapters

I’ve been reviewing HVX200 accessories like tripods, monitors, storage, etc. Once I got to matte boxes and filters for HVX200, I knew I have to include lens adapters.

Panasonic HVX200 is dubbed as the low-budget filmmakers HD camera. Although it has an impressive lens (Leica, 13x zoom lens), the lens is by no means a be-all, end-all lens.


If you’re into extreme sports videos, you probably need a wide-angle lens. If you do skateboards, you need a fish-eye. It has become a standard shot although a bit cliche.

The fish-eye lens for Panasonic HVX200 for extreme sportsThe Super Fisheye from Century Optics produces an “extraordinary degree of barrel distortion with a magnification factor of approximately .55x. Adding the Super Fisheye to HVX200’s 13x Zoom Lens, results in a 92° horizontal angle of view.” The fish-eye works wonders whether you’re shooting from below (someone jumping over you), or above (top of half-pipe).

Wide-angle lenses have an incredible depth of field so you might want to go wide for action shots or tracking shots. If the auto-focus is not 100% spot on, you’ll save your shot by going wide. Robert Rodriguez shot some of the action scenes in El Mariachi with a 5.7 Kinoptic wide-angle lens. He didn’t even need to focus, he just pointed the camera in the direction of the action.

Extreme close-ups: if you need those, there are “achromatic diopter” lenses that you attach to the zoom lens. You’ll probably only need them for a few shots, so you could just rent or borrow these. Apart from shooting flowers and bugs, you can find usage for these by shooting dilating pupils (e.g. Requem for a Dream).

Tele converter for Panasonic HVX200Tele lenses are always popular with amateur filmmakers although not always for the right reasons. The “zoom” factor on a lens has become a marketing gimmick. Get this 400x digital zoom now. Using digital zoom however ruins the quality of the footage. There could be a few exceptions where you might need that extra push but you’ll be better off with a tele converter. There are plenty to choose from but not all are created equal. I think a 1.6x tele converter is about the highest you want to go. The ones that come from eBay are 2x and go for 50 bucks should go to the trash.

Talking of adapters and converters, there’s one important distinction to make. Converters will allow you to use the whole zoom range (i.e. go from wide to tele). Adapters usually only extend your range. For example, a .6 wide-angle adapter will give you a 40% wider angle of view. You can usually zoom a bit before you experience vignetting on an adapter.

Some manufacturers also offer (or plan to do so) 35mm lens adapters for HVX200. The discussion about these is still raging on but maybe I could do a review once the dust settles somewhat. Combining film depth of field with HVX200’s frame rates will make this camera a totally different beast. I mean that in the nicest sort of way.

Panasonic HVX200: More Accessories

When I reviewed accessories for HVX200, I went through tripods and heads. Today we examine matte boxes, filters, lens adapters, and storage. Next, I’ll review lens adapters for HVX200.


Matte Box: HVX200 is a filmmaker’s dream and no dream is complete without a matte box. The matte box is not simply meant to make you look like a filmmaker. It reduces flair and also serves as a way to standardize filters and gels.

For example, Vocas matte boxes accommodate 3X3″ through 4×6″ filters and work with most wide angle lenses in both 4:3 and 16:9 aspect ratios. Matte boxes usually start below $1,000 but once you add a few flags and masks and you could be in the $2,000+ range.

Filters for Panasonic HVX200Filters: Your spanking new matte box needs some fancy filters. Tiffen has its series of filter sets that supposedly create a “filmlike” effect. Considering the frame rates supported by HVX200, it will be a shame not to go for the film look.

The 4×4″ Film Look set costs about $700 and you’ll probably need more than these. Keep in mind that heavy use of filters will result in a reduction of the light going to the CCDs. In other words, more filters will require bigger lights. Early footage from the HVX200 is pretty dark so you might need quite a few lights to make anything work.

If you shoot in bright sunshine, you might want to get a bunch of softening and neutral density filters of different grades. ND filters will reduce light, softening filters will soften the harsh quality of the sunlight.

P2 storage for Panasonic HVX200Storage: The HDV cameras that are in HVX200’s class all support recording to MiniDV. In order to utilize fully DVCPRO HD, HVX200 records to P2 memory chips. This means if you plan to record anything longer than an hour, you need additional storage. At the very least it could be a laptop - get one with a big HD and fast USB/Firewire ports (USB 1.1 vs USB 2.0). You could also get an external hard drive but that will only serve as a backup recorder.

OK, I think we just spent another $6,000-8,000 easy. No money for lens adapters. You can borrow these anyway. I’ll review lens adapters for HVX200 in a separate post.

You still got to get lens adapters, capture / real-time cards, editing software, editing workstation/server, etc. Not to mention - a ton of lights. But that’s another post!

Panasonic HVX200 - footage at 60 FPS

The DVXuser site has been a source for all things HVX200. Jarred Land has posted some more HVX footage, this time he shot cheerleaders (wow!) at 60 FPS.

Panasonic HVX200 (Front): offers variable framerates at 720pRemember that HVX200 specs stated that the camera will support a variety of frame rates at 720p: 12, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 30, 32, 36, 48, and 60 FPS.

The main advantage of shooting at speeds above 30 FPS is that when you play the video at 30 FPS (or 24 for that matter), it will have a slow motion effect similar to what you have when you shoot film at higher speeds.

Without further ado, here’s the forum link to the footage. All in all, I think Panasonic has done an incredible job with the HVX200. I would love to see them follow up with a bit higher-end model that offers what Canon XL H1 does, i.e. interchangeable lenses.

Wedding Videography 2: Dude, where’s my Dad?

Yesterday I reviewed several HD cameras with a specific regard to shooting wedding videos in HD. Thinking about it again, I’m not sure it’s such a good idea… here’s why:

HDV has native support for 16:9 and naturally wedding videographers would want to utilize that. This might lead to the problem once you transfer to SD for those relatives that still don’t have Blu-Ray. I’ll call it:

Dude-where’s-my-Dad-syndrome

Wedding videos in HDThe syndrom is most pronounced when guests tend to line up in a way that’s very horizontal (see ancient photo on the right).

I’ve put question marks where all the missing relatives will be… once you transfer your work to SD.

There are two “solution” that are equally unacceptable: use a pan-and-scan transfer or put your picture in a letterbox (black bars above and below).

Fortunately, you won’t have to consider these post-production options, if you’ve done some pre-planning. On shots where the guests have lined horizontally, you can do a pan making sure you got everyone (at 4:3). If you’d like to avoid pans (amateur look), you might do two shots: one at 16:9 and one at 4:3. The 4:3 might be a pan. When you later edit the video, you’ll be able to create a 16:9 and a 4:3 version.

Wedding videos in HDJust for the record, the question mark on the left (see arrow) is her Royal Majesty, the Queen (UK!). If you could go back in time, and you were invited to the wedding, and you had an HDV camera, and you’ve read this post, you might have done a shot that includes the Queen. Voila.

Later, when doing the sound track, you might put Sex Pistols singing “… God save the Queen, she ain’t no human being…” Gotta love punk rock.

If you have any questions or comments about wedding videograhy and HD, post them below!

Peter Jackson - Kong is King but what’s next

Peter Jackson at the King Kong PremiereI’ve been following Peter Jackson’s King Kong for some time now. I went through the production diary and the trailer but now the movie’s made it into theaters.

I’ll do a King Kong review when I see it over the weekend. I don’t have 3 hours to spare during the week.

Peter Jackson’s next project is will be based on a book by Alice Sebold called The Lovely Bones. The book is a bout a 14-year-old girl, Susie, who is raped, murdered and dismembered.

The story’s told from her perspective as she watches from heaven over her family which is trying to cope with what happened.

The major challenge for Peter will be to visualize Heaven which is left pretty vague in the book itself.

WETA people - go back to work!

Panasonic HVX200 - Release date

Panasonic HVX200 (Front): offers variable framerates at 720pFinally. The wait is over. Panasonic has announced the release date for the Panasonic HVX200 - December 29. Ever since they released the final HVX200 specs a month ago, there’s been a lot of talk but most doubted that Panasonic will make their self-imposed deadline - 2005.

Along with the date there’s plenty of HVX200 related news as well.

First of all, actual footage from the HVX200 has been released. You can visit DVXUser or go directly to the download link.

HVX200 frame rates have been confirmed for 720p: 12, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 30, 32, 36, 48, and 60 FPS.

P2 memory has been confirmed as the only format cabable of handling DVCPRO HD and the various frame rates. There’s some hope that as early as Spring 2006, there will be hard drives that will be able to handle it. Right now, an 8GB chip will store about 20 minutes of 720/24p. (USB 1.1 vs USB 2.0 speed comparison).

True 24P: this is the best feature for indie filmmakers. Instead of the 3:2:2:3 pulldown, the HVX200 uses true 24p (or more accurately 23.98 fps).

For additional info, read the FAQ at Panasonic.

I’d say we got a winner!

Spike Lee Talks to Slate

Spike LeeSpike Lee has just come out with an autobiography, That’s My Story and I’m Sticking to It. That’s probably behind his desire to talk to the media, including Slate.

The interview specifically addresses Lee’s comment about the Holocaust movies getting all the awards:

Slate: …You pretty much said that any movie about the Holocaust is going to carry all the prizes.

Lee: Whoa, whoa! What I was speaking of specifically was the feature-length documentary branch of the academy. I mean, there was a time—you could do the research, I don’t have the chart in front of me—but for a period of over 10 years, almost every film that won best feature-length documentary was about the Holocaust.

You can read the Lee interview at Slate. It’s not much fun, I hope the book is better.

Hollywood’s Xmas vows: fewer movies

With DVD sales flattening, Variety re-examines the big studios. Most of the executives interviewed requested to remain anonymous, a clear sign it’s time to face some unpleasant realities.

Wedding Crashers - one of the few movies in the 30-70M range that made a profitDVD sales have been the engine for studio growth in the last 5 years but in the last 12 months the DVD market is flattening. There’s some new distribution channels on the horizon: like Sony’s Blu-Ray DVD (or Toshiba’s alternative HD-DVD) and even the new video iPod (limited to tv series or ipod torrents). These new markets are not mature enough however to compensate the overall decrease in revenues.

Although the major studios are facing different problems, the majority of studio executives agreed on several points:

  • Limit movies in the $35 million to $70 million range
  • Financial partners are no longer an option — they’re required
  • Trim marketing budgets
  • Make fewer movies

In terms of the mid-budget movies, Variety quotes a COO at a major studio:

If you look at the $40 million to $70 million budget film, they are so difficult. They rarely have top box office stars, and they’re such risky territory because you have to spend $25 million on P&A, so it’s a huge investment. It’s really hard to get that back.

It’s still debatable if this spells GOOD news for indie producers. If the market continues to contract in the next year, studios might need to find ways to market smaller and cheaper movies. They could plagiarize the NASA motto: faster, better, cheaper.

A few examples that Hollywood could take to heart: Russian-made The Return (Возвращение) was produced for under $500,000 and made over ten times that. Sofia Coppola’s Lost in Translation also resulted in 1:10 ratio: a budget of just $4M resulted in revenues in excess of $40M internationally. Of course, a profit of a few million can’t plug in the holes made by a disaster like Zathura

Sundance Film Festival: Selection

13 (Tsmaeti)The official selection for the 2006 Sundance Film Festival is now public. There are 64 feature films in four categories. A total of 120 films will be shown at the festvial, 48 of those are done by first-time filmmakers.

What amazes me is the the competition. Indie producers should take note - there were 3,148 entries this year which is about TWICE the number form last year. I’m listing the movies by in the Dramatic category:

Dramatic (USA)

  • A Guide to Recognizing Your Saints directed and written by Dito Montiel
  • Come Early Morning directed and written by Joey Lauren Adams
  • Flannel Pajamas directed and written by Jeff Lipsky
  • Forgiven directed and written by Paul Fitzgerald
  • Half Nelson directed by Ryan Fleck; written by Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck
  • Hawk Is Dying directed by Julian Goldberger
  • In Between Days directed by So Yung Kim
  • Puccini For Beginners directed and written by Maria Maggenti
  • Quinceanera directed and written by Richard Glatzer & Wash Westmoreland
  • Right At Your Door directed and written by Chris Gorak
  • Sherrybaby directed and written by Laurie Collyer
  • Somebodies directed and written by Hadjii
  • Stay directed and written by Bob Goldthwait
  • Steel City directed and written by Brian Jun
  • Stephanie Daley directed and written by Hilary Brougher
  • Wristcutters — A Love Story directed by Goran Dukic

Dramatic (Intl)

  • 13 Tzameti directed and written by Gela Babluani
  • Allegro directed by Christoffer Boe
  • The Aura directed by Fabian Bielinsky
  • The Blossoming of Maximo Oliveros directed by Auraeus Solito
  • Eve & the Fire Horse directed and written by Julia Kwan
  • Grbavica directed and written by Jasmila Zbanic
  • The House of Sand directed by Andrucha Waddington
  • Kiss Me Not on the Eyes directed and written by Jocelyne Saab
  • Little Red Flowers directed by Zhang Yuan
  • Madeinusa directed and written by Claudia Llosa
  • No. 2 directed and written by Toa Fraser
  • One Last Dance directed and written by Max Makowski
  • The Peter Pan Formula directed and written by Cho Chang-Ho
  • Princesas directed and written by Fernando Leon de Aranoa
  • Solo Dios Sabe directed by Carlos Bolado
  • Son of Man directed by Mark Dornford-May

Enjoy! I know I will… despite Sundance not being that indie anymore. If it’s good cinema, I don’t care if it’s indie or not.

Peter Jackson is off scuba diving…

If you follow Peter Jackson’s production diary for King Kong, you’ve probably seen the latest note:

With 3 weeks left until the film opens Peter and his crews are left with not much to do, Peter has decided to take a 2 and 1/2 week break and go scuba diving while he gives his entire crew time off to sleep and drink tequila…NOT! The crew are working DOUBLE-TIME to get the final 3 reels of film ready for mass production in facilities around the globe.

Production diary for King KongPeter Jackson may have lost 80 pounds (obvious in the King Kong movie trailer) but he definitely has some sense of humor left. I bet 7 months of shooting and 7 more for post production are tiring. Hope he finds time for scuba diving once the movie premiers (Dec 17?).

Update: I just did a review of King Kong. Enjoy!




Recommended Gear

More Links